A Palapye District Council leadership dispute has reached the High Court, where BPF councillor David Ikanyeng is challenging Minister Motshegwa’s decision to reinstate a UDC councillor removed through a motion of no confidence as chairperson
SESUPO RANTSIMAKO
The leadership tussle at the Palapye District Council (PDC) has escalated into a full-blown legal confrontation, with Botswana Patriotic Front (BPF) councilor David Ikanyeng filing an urgent application in the Gaborone High Court to challenge the Minister of Local Government and Traditional Affairs’ decision to reinstate an Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) councilor as council chairperson.
Court papers indicate that Ikanyeng is seeking to overturn the directive by Minister Ketlhalefile Motshegwa, arguing that the intervention unlawfully reversed a resolution taken by elected councilors.
He has cited the Minister as the first respondent, alongside the Palapye District Council, UDC councilor Kabo Ketshogile, and the Attorney General. His legal representatives are Abel Lawyers.
COUNCIL POWER SHIFT SPARKS DISPUTE
The dispute originates from a recent motion of no confidence passed by councilors that led to the removal of Ketshogile from the council chairmanship. Following his removal, Ikanyeng was elected to replace him and briefly assumed the position.
However, the leadership transition triggered swift intervention from the minister, who suspended council and committee meetings, citing governance failures and the council’s alleged inability to effectively discharge its statutory responsibilities.
At the time, Motshegwa said the suspension was intended to restore order, strengthen governance systems, and ensure that council operations aligned with the interests of residents.
MINISTER REVERSES SUSPENSION DECISION
In a surprise turn of events, the minister later lifted the suspension and set aside the council’s resolution removing Ketshogile. The decision effectively reinstated the UDC councilor as chairperson, reversing Ikanyeng’s brief tenure.
The move has since sparked renewed tensions within the council, deepening political divisions between BPF and UDC aligned councillors. Critics argue that the minister’s intervention undermines the autonomy of elected local authorities, while supporters maintain it was necessary to stabilise governance.
LEGAL QUESTIONS OVER MINISTERIAL AUTHORITY
The urgent application before the High Court now places the minister’s actions under judicial scrutiny, with Ikanyeng arguing that the decision to overturn the council resolution exceeded lawful authority.
The respondents are expected to defend the minister’s powers to intervene in local government affairs where governance breakdowns are alleged.
HIGH COURT TO DETERMINE OUTCOME
At the heart of the case is whether the minister acted within the confines of the law when he suspended council operations and subsequently reinstated Ketshogile as chairperson.
The High Court is expected to determine the legality of both the suspension and the reversal of the council’s resolution, a ruling that could have wider implications for the balance of power between central government and local authorities in Botswana.